Economic impacts of MMU

Economic impacts of the MMU estimated:

Firstly,

for the western OECD countries (where the math poverty percent shares are typically 20-30%), without MMU interventions, these countries may need to expect the surplus 20-30% unemployments as the AI-induced job destructions rampantly spread by 2025-2030.
for the countries with the math poverty percent shares 45-95%, except the oil-richest or other natural resource richest countries, their unemployments due to the massive automations may arrive a bit later, but due to their high math poverty percent shares, their massive economic crises will rise.

Secondly, using the TIMSS math average compared to the GDP per capita 2019.

The horizontal axis is the percent shares of students who have escaped from the math poverty. The vertical axis is the log of GDP per capita. So, as you can see the pattern clearly, the more students escape from the math poverty, there is clear, positive correlation between the less math poverty percent share vs. the exponential growth of their log of GDP per capita (2018).

As the graph below has the log of GDP per capita for the vertical axis, the real impacts of the reductions of the math poverty percent shares will have the exponential GDP per capita impacts. The chart below is only the relatively short term GDP per capita impacts. For a long term economic impacts, the overall impacts will be substantially higher than what is estimated as below.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

MMU1: just to uplift the math poorest half average to the math top half average, which normally would take at least 50-100 years in the average OECD nations with almost no exceptions at least according to the PISA and TIMSS math rsults 1995-2015 (and you should know that this is a revolution, not some sort of useless reforms that have been going on in the entire developed OECD nations). To reduce the hyper-skepticism, my initial target may be reducing the math poverty by 20-30% and raising the proficiency in similar manner, which still would normally take at least 30-50+ years in at least 90% of the developed countries, their states or big cities. Current focus is on the MMU1 series as the warm-up exercises as forms of pilot studies to demonstrate the math EDU revolution is not only possible in spite of the hyper-bureaucracy of the EDU establishments that simply would not any of the most breakthrough innovations in EDU and will instead keep on playing with the furitless, fancy toys of the math EDU apps and technology.

USL will use the colossal cognitive capital potentials of STEM education (especially Math at the moment), because USL can make the learning 10-50 times faster and more effective than the Business As Usual typically, to trigger the equally colossal gains in the socio-economy in exchange of their willingness of the participating governments - under a new UN-led treaty hopefully - to collectively contribute the reasonable ratios of the expected surplus gains in their economies to resolve the top global crises. Each of the governments will mostly focus on resolving their crises of course, but they have to contribute to the world communities to prosper with the sustainable growths together not at the exclusion of half of the world that is poverty-stricken. USL 1 will be the fastest, easiest, and cheapest way to collectively contribute the effectively gained, USL1.0-induced surplus economy (in a sustainable manner) to resolve the most serious global crises (for all governments and the UN) based on the 5UE principles: to transition towards the resource-based, renewable energy-based, sustainable global environment and the circular economy, to help end the poverty much faster than without, while making the average people learn math and science faster and easier than prodigies. As the original USL is too fast and too disruptive (as it can literally make average people learn math and science 1,000%-50,000% times faster) to transform and people are too skeptical, we are currently focusing on only 2-5% and up to 10% at most of its capacity called USL 0.25-0.5-1.0 for the state and national governments as well as the UN.

STEP 1) Math Education Reform USL 0.25 at the city and USL 0.5 at the state government levels (advancing their regional average math skill levels by half a year, which normally takes 10-30 years to most of the OECD countries, in just 2-3 years). STEP 2) Math Education Reform USL 0.5 at the state government levels (advancing their regional average math skill levels by 1 year or more, which normally takes 2-5 decades to most of the OECD countries, in just 2-4 years). STEP 3) Math Education Reform USL 1 at the national government & the UN treaty levels (advancing their regional average math skill levels by 2 years or more, which (almost) never happened to virtuallly all of the OECD member countries, in just 2-5 years). For each of the following step, we will try to create local, regional, or national Social Enterprise for each government - if they are willing as the gains are tremendous potentially - to share the profits together. So the governments will have the 3-layered benefits: ... 1) USL 0.x will enrich not only the math education that helps each USL x participating regions, 2) but also to prosper together as Social Enterprise board members of the corresponding regions. 3) once the UN gets involved, then the certain portions of the massive surpluses to their local or regional economies will be properly redistributed for the global social, energy, environmental, equality and poverty causes.

This is a relatively new endeavour of Lee’s for the foreign languages. The origins of this series stem from the following two: 1) Based on his crazy personal experiment to learn to speak 9 new languages in the mere 10 days (roughly equivalent to speak 25-30 western european languages in just 10 days). 2) Lee’s early experiment with 10 people to make the average people speak English super fast although not nearly as fast as Lee himself during his experiment.

The current focus to open a new chapter to make people speak languages very fast:

SKF (Speak Korean Fast): to make all people speak the survival levels of Korean language in just 1-2-3 semesters.
The appetizer version of the trimester (3 months) of SKF: to make people speak the basic introduction level Korean with the minimum studies.
SFF (Speak French Fast): waiting for enough people to sign up.

%d bloggers like this: